Post-Industrial Adaptation

The other day I caught the final episode of ‘Arctic: with Bruce Parry’ on SBS. I had missed the first part of the series, but in this episode, the intrepid Bruce spent some time with a group of Sámi people in Norway. Sámi (or Saami) are the indigenous people of Sápmi, which covers the portions of Finland, Norway, Sweden and the Russian Kola Peninsula that are within and around the Arctic circle. Sámi are semi-nomadic and many still pursue customary livelihoods, including their well-known reindeer-herding traditions. Of course, what with modern politics and global warming, the Sámi’s traditions and lifestyles are under threat, as has happened with most indigenous cultures around the world.

So Bruce headed off to live with a reindeer-herding family and find out how their lifestyles are changing. Despite maintaining many of their traditions and customs (the old matriarch still wore her full traditional costume), many other parts of their lives had kept up with modern technologies – they herded reindeer in helicopters and on snowmobiles, got about in fairly sturdy subzero adventure-wear, and even used a ferry to herd the deer across a particular river because a bridge and town had been built at their usual crossing place.

While I watched Bruce frolic in the snow with his new family of (very attractive) Sámi brothers, I found myself thinking about adaptation. Here was a prime example of a Homo indigenous species adapting to ‘modern’, westernised society. They didn’t let the ‘new’ world conquer them and phase them out of the history books. They didn’t simply give up the life they had followed for centuries, move to the city, get a 9-5 job and play with iGadgets. They preserved their traditions, worked out what modern society could offer them, took the benefits and got on with their traditional life.

Now, for the cynics among you, it’s possible a little bit of the story had been romanticised for television, but there is still a grain of Truth there. I imagine it would have been very easy for the Sámi to give up reindeer-herding once urban development and modern political and legal systems began making things difficult. But they didn’t. They adapted and dealt with the new problems as best they could, so they could maintain their Identity.

Similar adaptations have happened elsewhere in the world, including Inuits in Canada or Native Americans, traditional farming cultures in India or Bedouin tribes in Africa and the Middle East. These people find it possible to maintain the aspects of their culture that form their main identity, yet still take advantage of modern developments that can benefit their lifestyles.

Cryogenics, Indian-style…

So, if it is possible for humans to adapt in this manner, why do Homo digitalis, Homo industrialis or Homo economicus find it so hard to adapt in the opposite direction? Why do ‘westernised’ humans react so desperately against talk of peak oil, global warming and wind farms? How can these humans remotely conquer indigenous lands via development applications, legal manipulations and political permits, yet take umbrage when asked to change their habits by turning off some light switches or ceasing to manufacture redundant plastic junk?

These indigenous cultures that show such ability to adapt are the same cultures that have been persecuted for being ‘primitive’ or ‘underdeveloped’ for centuries. Yet they are still here, in this age of nanotechnology, space travel and terabytes – they have adapted and survived, while still keeping their ancient traditions and lifestyles alive. If industrialisation failed tomorrow, they probably wouldn’t notice. ‘Developed’ humans, on the other hand, swinging off the umbilical cord of Convenience and Entitlement, would be in quite a pickle.

© Manu Saunders 2012

3 thoughts on “Post-Industrial Adaptation

  1. Mike March 29, 2012 / 10:45 PM

    Nice post Manu

    The reasons why the various subspecies of human you mention (you forgot Homo agriculturis and Homo hillbillyensis) refuse to accept what those of us in the know shout about are many, but in general terms I can get it down to two…greed and intelligence (or lack thereof). The first is obvious. Large corporations whose board members are at the mercy of greedy shareholders must continue in their quest to constantly return higher and higher profits. The easiest and safest way to do this is to maintain the business model, keep the pollution coming and don’t give the market any jitters. Tied in with this are the media barrons, often large shareholders themselves. It is their job to discredit anyone who could potentially adversely affect their bottom line. Fox is of course the model. Of late its been the other way around here in Australia with mining tycoons like Gina Reinhart buying 10% of Channel 10. Shortly after that transaction, Andrew Bolt, rightwing shock jock, Murdoch columnist and general arseclown had his own television show, the format and content of which is modelled closely on the Glen Beck show on Fox in the USA. This type of garbage is pedalled directly at an ever increasingly stupid public who are all too ready to believe whatever they are told as long as itson the telly, rightwing and tied in with some sort nationalistic bullshit. In my travels through the blogosphere I constantly come across these people. What is interesting is they seem to oppose anything that is based in science. Some of them are so out there they start carrying on about illuminati, chemtrails, HAARP, UFO’s and all sorts of nonsense. These are the same people who thought that really terrible Tom Hanks movie (I know thats many of them) was a documentary.
    As for farmers and hillbillies, the irony is that while many of them are hostile to anything associated with climate change, these groups are probably the most able to survive if some sort of cataclysmic climate event forced us into a post-industrial subsistence lifestyle. I too would be fortunate having grown up as a farmer, I have no problems providing food for my family having grown food and butchered animals most of my life. I guess on the whole we have somehow stepped out and away from nature. Hell, there are people out there who will look you straight in the eye and tell you that humans are not animals. I have little hope for them.


    • manuelinor March 30, 2012 / 10:19 AM

      Thank you Mike.
      I would agree with you that greed is definitely the catalyst for many of the world’s problems today. I also have faith that things will change. And I would not say that I am “in the know” – I am merely voicing what I believe to be Truth…others will always disagree!


  2. Mehera July 14, 2012 / 3:36 PM

    There is a great book written by an English Anthropologist called Piers Vitebsky who lived with a reindeer tribe over many years and studied lots of things, including whether or not they adapt. I wont try to summarise his studies or conclusions as it took him a whole book to do that – but anyone interested in this topic may enjoy tracking down a copy of his book. It is called “Reindeer People” and is published by Harper Collins 2005


What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s